Jerry, are you not seeing what the rest of us are seeing? The judge obviously sees the framework of a quid pro quo and has appointed one of the most conservative litigators to assist him in legally exposing it or convincing him there is nothing there since there is no adversarial position being taken. There is no “cover your assism.” Thi…
Jerry, are you not seeing what the rest of us are seeing? The judge obviously sees the framework of a quid pro quo and has appointed one of the most conservative litigators to assist him in legally exposing it or convincing him there is nothing there since there is no adversarial position being taken. There is no “cover your assism.” This is a smart legal move by a Judge who just wants to get it right. Isn’t that the whole point of our legal system even though it does not always work that way?
Jerry, are you not seeing what the rest of us are seeing? The judge obviously sees the framework of a quid pro quo and has appointed one of the most conservative litigators to assist him in legally exposing it or convincing him there is nothing there since there is no adversarial position being taken. There is no “cover your assism.” This is a smart legal move by a Judge who just wants to get it right. Isn’t that the whole point of our legal system even though it does not always work that way?