14 Comments
User's avatar
JNelliE's avatar
6hEdited

The evil 4….which includes a diabolical version of elastigirl. She’ll stretch any lie as far and wide as necessary as long as it protects her master (technically they’ll all stretch any falsehood to protect the man).

These 4 Trumpian’s will inevitably learn that loyalty only goes one way when it comes to #47.

Expand full comment
Betsy Brazy's avatar

Nicely done. Attorney-client privilege is the client’s right, not the attorneys, and these Crackerbox poseurs should know better. Well, that a violation of the Duty of Competence.

Expand full comment
JNelliE's avatar

Thank you for explaining the details from this moment of utter corruption within the rot of #47’s regime.

Expand full comment
BeachDoc08's avatar

It’s astonishing how quickly and completely the DOJ has been corrupted by Trump & his co-conspirators; in less than a year.

Expand full comment
jane's avatar

Thank you, Ms. Gill.

Expand full comment
Robin Gilmartin's avatar

Thank God for whistleblowers like Erez Reuveni! It’s now time to get to the bottom of it!

Expand full comment
Steve Forman's avatar

Thank you Allison for the in depth explanation of the legal intricacies of this case. Remind me again why you are not an attorney? 😀

Expand full comment
Wd52's avatar

#Trump is and has always been a #Mobster, owned by Moscow and Saudi for the last 30 years, by the FBI & CIA before that, and WAS a #MOB STOOLIE TO DA #Giuliani in NY the late 1980s. That's how they first met!

FULL HISTORY:

1. https://gregolear.substack.com/p/tinker-tailor-mobster-trump

2. https://gregolear.substack.com/p/from-trump-to-trump-how-the-mobs

3. https://gregolear.substack.com/p/give-me-secrecy-and-give-me-death

Expand full comment
Julie Jennings's avatar

Such clarity of writing Allison. Thank you for helping us understand these legal issues!

Expand full comment
Mark McPeek's avatar

If you did nothing wrong, why do you not want to testify?? Huh???

Expand full comment
Scott Grund's avatar

Thank you AG! Can't wait to see the follow up from this.

Expand full comment
RaoulNY's avatar

What boggles the mind here is that the DOJ is the organization that is under consideration for criminal contempt - it's leadership and minions alike. Under what legal system would you return a complaint to the same criminal enterprise that committed the crimes they are accused of to investigate themselves? Take all the rhetoric and politics out of the equation and employ what I grew up knowing as "the grandma doctrine" - what would grandma do?

The fact that SCOTUS would even consider going along with this, regardless of the so called historical or legal precedents (are there really any equivalent here?) shows great discredit to them, and their institution, and raises larger questions as to the legitimacy of this regime.

When in the course of human events ....

Expand full comment
Jane's avatar

Thank you so much Ms. Gill. Now, please get some much needed rest.

Expand full comment
GraciousMonkey's avatar

thank you!!

Expand full comment