35 Comments
User's avatar
Shire Jansen's avatar

Am I wrong in thinking that Rudy being at tfg rallies (+) is not in keeping with normal bail conditions that indicate your can't hang out with indicted co conspirators? Also curious, since GA didn't follow Grand Jury recommended indictment for Lindsey, his meddling in Nebraska won't count as a repeat offense? I also don't understand how voting rules be changed after the voter registration deadline? Republicans are trying to steal another election, that makes three in a row.

Expand full comment
Bonnie's avatar

Seem like they win win win by just counting on sheer exhaustion of our systems with snowballing of things like this! Our system was not built to accommodate this level of dirtbaggery and collision. Roger Stone! Flynn! Soany others are seemingly free as birds, and WHY????

Expand full comment
Shire Jansen's avatar

Exactly, why did NC approve a $1M expense (+ reprint/delay) to their constituents for a straw candidate who didn't even try to qualify for all States and missed their deadline for removal? Cheating is a feature, not a bug, for Republicans. The planners of events surrounding J6 should have been at least charged for falsified permit applications and billed for the damages to property, tfg should be billed for all of the legal costs incurred by DC Courts to prosecute his invitees. Sick of the BS, Vote 💙.

Expand full comment
Susan Garrity Benton's avatar

Wearing people out is a bona fide tactic. That and an atmosphere of chaos are the tools narcissists use

to manipulate people and situations.

Expand full comment
Heather.B's avatar

The judiciary has proven to be bold and arrogant when faced with illegal acts by ordinary citizens; but they are meek when the defendant has money and power — thereby proving the lie — of equal protection under the law.

Everyone knows he's guilty, but here we are, delayed by a corrupt Supreme Court.

Anyway, this isn't it past your jail time? t-shirt will NEVER get old 👇

https://libtees-2.creator-spring.com/listing/jailtm

Expand full comment
NothingButNet's avatar

Everyone knows he’s guilty of what?

Expand full comment
Kay G's avatar

Thank you for your post and attachment - some of the judiciary seems to take their role seriously. Other members forget that the phrase “consent of the governed” that that those founding fathers used. They would do well to remember it. Justice delayed is Justice denied. The people of these United States have been subjected to years of lies and disinformation, an attack from within, from a compromised Supreme Court. There are too many guns available in the United States, 400 million, also c/o the Supreme Court to continue this ongoing trauma to our democracy.

Expand full comment
DR Darke's avatar

"Well, if the Supreme Court says I have to be thorough? Unlike Trumpy's Parking Lot Lawyers, *I* can be very VERY thorough.

"What my motion will NOT be is concise, not when I have to defend EVERYTHING...!"

Expand full comment
Robert  Taylor's avatar

Thank ya young lady, thank ya verrry much. Can’t wait for tRump ta leave the building! Lev Parnas sends his love! UKRAINE UKRAINE UKRAINE!

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Whiny Drumpf and company. When will he go to prison and be quiet.

Expand full comment
Victoria Brown's avatar

You rock AG!

Jack Smith has so many work

arounds Trump and his

erstwhile attorneys, he'll

drown them in motions and

running to court. Billable

hours; hope they're getting

their dirty bucks upfront.

Expand full comment
ZCob's avatar

Watch Harry LITMAN interview Judge Littig from this week. He explains SC 6; Judge adds a seasoned honest honorable view w the constitution as the rule of law.

It’s so telling!

We must arm ourselves w thr facts to look ahead.

Expand full comment
Mickey8255's avatar

Judge Littig is Awesome!!

Expand full comment
Daniel Howley's avatar

Your prescience is reassuring because it endorses Jack Smith's choices in this part of Trump's trial to keep evidence and reasoning under seal and predicts that Trump's defense will have few credible arguments to ask Judge Chutkin to dismiss the case against Trump without hearing Smith's arguments on immunity.

Expand full comment
Jeep Waver's avatar

Great guess on their rebuttal!!

Expand full comment
CB's avatar

Thank you, AG!

Expand full comment
Free Spirit 57's avatar

Great anticipation of Trump's lawyers rebuttal! Of course he doesn't read (supposedly). Maybe they'll teach him to read in jail.

Expand full comment
Pat Eisenberg's avatar

Thank you!!

Expand full comment
amber bakes's avatar

WOW AG it's like you have brain jacked his poopy pants lawyers. You sounded so much like them. I bet their poorly written response won't be too different from what you wrote. So sick of all of them but thank you for keeping us up to date on all their BS.

Expand full comment
Patrick Daniels aka Cromulent1's avatar

Huge thanks to you AG, for providing some hopeful insight on the path forward against this vapid wastrel and his coterie of ignoble poltroons!

SCOTUS have become players in Trumps favor, while “We the Serfs” observe injustice carried out by unelected contumacious judges, quite a turn of events!

Expand full comment
Susan Linehan's avatar

Your estimate of trump's proposed response is almost perfect except it isn't nearly whiny enough.

Expand full comment